When async screening is the wrong tool
We sell this software, and we still think there are rounds where you should pick up the phone instead. Here are the cases where recorded answers make hiring worse.
Read articlePage 1 of 2, 12 posts in total
We sell this software, and we still think there are rounds where you should pick up the phone instead. Here are the cases where recorded answers make hiring worse.
Read articleGraduate hiring compresses hundreds of candidates into the weeks students have least time. Async screening fits that shape better than a calendar ever will.
Read articleFour hundred applicants and one recruiter is a filtering problem, not an interviewing one. What to automate, what to keep human, and where the bar actually slips.
Read articleThe second role you screen for should cost a fraction of the first. Templates are how, provided you keep them small and let each role edit its own copy.
Read articleRecording yourself answering questions into a laptop is a strange thing to ask of someone. A few decisions make it much less strange, and none of them cost you anything.
Read articleSame questions, same order, same bar, scored independently. It is the least charismatic idea in hiring and one of the few with decades of evidence behind it.
Read articleThirty minutes on the call, and then the scheduling, the reschedules, the no-shows and the context switch. Here is the arithmetic that makes async screening worth trying.
Read articleThe advantage of recorded answers is that everyone sees identical evidence. That advantage disappears the moment the first reviewer says what they thought out loud.
Read articleOne take is the most realistic. Three is the kindest. The right answer depends on whether you are assessing composure or content — and you can choose differently per question.
Read articleFive interview credits, no card needed. Send one link and watch the answers whenever it suits you.